significance

Why Future Forward Matters

history

Future Forward’s program model is based on multiple research studies that have proven the effectiveness of both “develop[ing] the literacy skills of early-grade students and support[ing] families as they learn to support the literacy development of their students” (Jones, 2015, p. 1). By supporting the needs of the whole child, Future Forward joins other successful interventions and meets the “strong evidence definitions” laid out in the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), and demonstrates that young, struggling readers can make significant yearly progress when given the tools, resources, and attention required to catch up to their peers.

In October 2017, the Department of Education awarded Education Analytics, Inc. a $7.8 million Education Innovation and Research (EIR) grant to implement Future Forward across multiple regions in the country and evaluate its impact. EA has established 14 Future Forward sites in three states, partnering with six Boys & Girls Clubs agencies, and is undergoing a random control trial evaluation conducted by Socially Responsible Evaluation in Education (SREed).

About the Education Innovation and Research Program at the Department of Education
The Education Innovation and Research (EIR) Program, established under section 4611 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), provides funding to create, develop, implement, replicate, or take to scale entrepreneurial, evidence-based, field-initiated innovations to improve student achievement and attainment for high-need students; and rigorously evaluate such innovations. The EIR program is designed to generate and validate solutions to persistent educational challenges and to support the expansion of effective solutions to serve substantially larger numbers of students.

Need

Learning to read is a skill; the ability to access, comprehend, and apply written instructions is essential to functioning effectively in an information-based society.

Third grade is a critical benchmark that marks the shift from students learning to read to students reading to learn. Students without a basic level of reading competency by third grade are more likely to struggle academically as well as to have social and behavioral issues in subsequent grades (Fiester, 2010). Research demonstrates that these students are four times as likely to drop out of high school than proficient readers, and dropouts are more likely to experience negative outcomes than their counterparts, including lower annual earnings and higher potential for mental and physical health problems (Center for Labor Market Studies, 2007; Fiester, 2013). Furthermore, early intervention is key: the likelihood of student dropout can be predicted with up to 70% accuracy by third grade, based on reading ability and prior retention (Hernandez, 2012). Given the potential negative long-term consequences of low reading proficiency, the fact that only 37% of fourth graders across the country are proficient in reading underscores the magnitude of the problem on a national scale (U.S. Department of Education, 1992-2017).

Research from the field also shows us that struggling students are disproportionately students of color and lower socioeconomic status. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) reading test scores reflect persistent achievement gaps between students eligible for the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) and their non-NSLP counterparts (U.S. Department of Education, 1990–2015).


In addition, these students demonstrated lower proficiency levels in fourth- and eighth-grade reading than their higher-income peers. With poverty rates rising among public school students, there is a clear and urgent need for cost-effective, research-based interventions that promote positive literacy outcomes for all students.

Solution

Future Forward is a research-proven, cost-effective, K–3 early reading intervention that answers this need by improving student reading achievement through research-based literacy programming within the school and family. The program is led by Pat Marcus, former Director of the SPARK early literacy program in Milwaukee, WI which was classified by the Center for Research and Reform in Education (CRRE) at Johns Hopkins University as one of a small number of literacy interventions that both work and meet the “strong evidence definitions” laid out in the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA).

Source: Jones, C. (2015). The Results of a Randomized Control Trial Evaluation of the SPARK Literacy Program.

In their external research evaluation of the SPARK Program, the Socially Responsible Evaluation in Education (SREed) at University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee found that including school-day one-on-one tutoring and intensive family engagements in a literacy model yielded positive and statistically significant impacts on student outcomes. Furthermore, the positive impact of the program was shown to remain stable one year after the end of participation: former participants scored significantly better on the spring 2016 STAR Reading assessment compared to control students, and former participants had 2.9 fewer school absences during the 2015–2016 school year compared to control students.

The research evaluation of the program met What Works Clearinghouse standards and suggests promise for Future Forward’s impact as the program is implemented in 14 sites across three different states. Future Forward expects that third party evaluation findings from the federal EIR grant will demonstrate a similar degree of impact on reading achievement and absenteeism outcomes for the student participants.

Resources
Fiester, L. (2010). Early Warning! Why Reading by the End of Third Grade Matters. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation.

Fiester, L. (2013). Early Warning Confirmed: Research Update on Third-Grade Reading. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation.

Center for Labor Market Studies. (2007). Left Behind in America: The Nation's Dropout Crisis. Retrieved from chicagowritingservice.com

Hernandez, D. (2012). Double Jeopardy: How Third-Grade Reading Skills and Poverty Influence High-School Graduation. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation.

Jones, C. (2015). The Results of a Randomized Control Trial Evaluation of the SPARK Literacy Program. Milwaukee, WI: Socially Responsible Evaluation in Education (SREed).

U.S. Department of Education. (1992-2017). Nations Report Card. Accessed from: https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_2017/nation/achievement?grade=4

Get in Touch